So I went to see the Cowboys play the Bears last Monday night. For those that have never been, the place is huge. It looks like no other sports arena. It looks like something from a Star Trek episode or Star Wars.
We had nose bleed seats - two rows from the top. We were with moths and floodlights. The screen was a sight to see. From our seats it just looked big, but from mid level, it looked crazy - overwhelming almost.
The game itself wasn't all that good in the first half. Romo fixed that in the second half. We didnt stay for the fourth.
Other thoughts on the place. The pro shops were huge. They only serve Miller beers, which I should psyched about, but they did serve my favorite High Life:).
One last thing. Circ du soliel was performing at the entrance... Not sure what to make of that.
Belly up to the bar, order your favorite pub grub and adult beverage, and let's talk some sports.
Sunday, October 07, 2012
Thursday, October 04, 2012
DC Not A "Sports Town?!?" Says Who??
On any given day, at any hour, you will normally find my radio tuned to NPR
(National Public Radio)--I'm getting older and crankier, and I don't have
patience for a lot of commercial hoisted blabbering. However, I tuned to my
local sports jock station (WJFK 106.7 FM - "The Fan") early Wednesday
morning to see if I could catch some talk about "Teddy," of the Washington
Nationals' "Racing Presidents," who finally won a race after seven years of
5th inning racing for the Nats. However, what I got was a blast of
commentary about an article written by Michael Wilbon (ESPN) trashing
Washington, DC, as either being a "terrible" sports town, or not being a
sports town at all!
When I came home from work that evening, my radio was blowing up with talk about Wilbon. I didn't listen too intently, figuring it'd blow off. But a day later (today) The FAN is still talking about it and it's really got Lavar Arrington back up. Well tonight, I listened, and I'm damn hot about Wilbon's comments.
When I came home from work that evening, my radio was blowing up with talk about Wilbon. I didn't listen too intently, figuring it'd blow off. But a day later (today) The FAN is still talking about it and it's really got Lavar Arrington back up. Well tonight, I listened, and I'm damn hot about Wilbon's comments.
By him calling my
hometown a "terrible" sports town, I want to run out and kick him straight
in the eggs! By the time I got MY back up, ready to zing out this blog
post, I was ready to dig into a lot of statistical details to show "him" how
dead wrong he is. But I decided not to do that--it wouldn't make any
difference. So, being true to my handle ("DC Homer"), here's what I have to
say about Wilbon's comments: Opinions are like assholes--everybody's got
one, and they usually stink. Although he gets
paid pretty nicely for his 2-minute drill flatulance, I think he's a terrible sportscaster (if that's what you call it). Okay--I'm done throwing aspersions.
Washington, DC, is a unique city in this great nation of ours, but that uniqueness doesn't make our sports franchises stand out from any other town. But I think it's wholly unfair to blast DC as being a terrible sports town, presumably because we have a lot of transient residents. But if you look at it--seriously--every one of the "major" NFL markets that most folks will absolutely declare ARE "great" sports towns (Dallas, New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Boston, Filthadelphia)--they, too, are "transient" cities. Neither their populations nor their fan bases are 100% born and raised in that town. No sir. It's clear to me that Wilbon's definition of a "sports" town is based solely on the number (and recent) championships they've won. But so what!?! Just because the Yankees have won a bunch of World Series, that makes the whole of New York City a "sports town?" NYC could easily have NOT won those championships, but would that still make NYC a sports town because it's a BIG town?
So, exactly what defines a "sports town?" Let's break it down:
- A large number of professional championships?
- A city with a professional franchise from each major sport?
- A large city?
- A small % of transient residents who root for teams other than the home team?
- A large number of colleges with (a lot) of D-I championships?
How many of those towns I mentioned above have all of those characteristics? Ummmm....let's see.....NONE! Cities like Boston and New York are rare. In fact, I'd say they are probably the only true "sports towns" by Wilbon's definition. Who follows hockey in Dallas? LA can't keep an NFL team, having lost it four times! How many Lombardi Trophies reside in Philly? Montreal has won 23 Stanley Cups--the closest contender is Toronto with 13 (Boston only has 6). Does that make Montreal or Toronto "sports towns?"
HELL NO! I've been to Dallas, and there are a LOT of Redskins fans there, also a lot of Raiders fans, and Broncos fans! This holds true for any major city, even "minor" cities! Washington, DC, is a great place to live--even with the traffic (no one's going to tell me DC traffic is worse than New York, Boston, LA, Atlanta, Chicago, or even Dallas--it's not). DC has all of the major sports teams, and is surrounded by a lot of great colleges, who produce a BUNCH of professional athletes! The high school sports programs here are top rate, and everywhere you look you see DC residents engaged in all kinds of sports--name one sport that you won't see played in the DC area on a regular basis?? Wanna challenge DC to some bacci ball or lawn darts?
paid pretty nicely for his 2-minute drill flatulance, I think he's a terrible sportscaster (if that's what you call it). Okay--I'm done throwing aspersions.
Washington, DC, is a unique city in this great nation of ours, but that uniqueness doesn't make our sports franchises stand out from any other town. But I think it's wholly unfair to blast DC as being a terrible sports town, presumably because we have a lot of transient residents. But if you look at it--seriously--every one of the "major" NFL markets that most folks will absolutely declare ARE "great" sports towns (Dallas, New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Boston, Filthadelphia)--they, too, are "transient" cities. Neither their populations nor their fan bases are 100% born and raised in that town. No sir. It's clear to me that Wilbon's definition of a "sports" town is based solely on the number (and recent) championships they've won. But so what!?! Just because the Yankees have won a bunch of World Series, that makes the whole of New York City a "sports town?" NYC could easily have NOT won those championships, but would that still make NYC a sports town because it's a BIG town?
So, exactly what defines a "sports town?" Let's break it down:
- A large number of professional championships?
- A city with a professional franchise from each major sport?
- A large city?
- A small % of transient residents who root for teams other than the home team?
- A large number of colleges with (a lot) of D-I championships?
How many of those towns I mentioned above have all of those characteristics? Ummmm....let's see.....NONE! Cities like Boston and New York are rare. In fact, I'd say they are probably the only true "sports towns" by Wilbon's definition. Who follows hockey in Dallas? LA can't keep an NFL team, having lost it four times! How many Lombardi Trophies reside in Philly? Montreal has won 23 Stanley Cups--the closest contender is Toronto with 13 (Boston only has 6). Does that make Montreal or Toronto "sports towns?"
HELL NO! I've been to Dallas, and there are a LOT of Redskins fans there, also a lot of Raiders fans, and Broncos fans! This holds true for any major city, even "minor" cities! Washington, DC, is a great place to live--even with the traffic (no one's going to tell me DC traffic is worse than New York, Boston, LA, Atlanta, Chicago, or even Dallas--it's not). DC has all of the major sports teams, and is surrounded by a lot of great colleges, who produce a BUNCH of professional athletes! The high school sports programs here are top rate, and everywhere you look you see DC residents engaged in all kinds of sports--name one sport that you won't see played in the DC area on a regular basis?? Wanna challenge DC to some bacci ball or lawn darts?
Bring it,
sumbitch!
Michael Wilbon: EAT MY SHORTS, and go back to whatever "sports town" you came from! You spend years jocking Michael Jordan to get where you are just so you can trash my hometown? Oh, and I heard, that with Fruit of the Loom waistband elastic still stuck between his teeth, Wilbon has backed off on his "terrile" comment, now saying: It's a pretty good sports town.but not great..."
Whatever!
In the words of Vincent (Vinny) LaGuardia "Bag of Donoughnuts" Gambini: "I'm through with DIS guy!"
Michael Wilbon: EAT MY SHORTS, and go back to whatever "sports town" you came from! You spend years jocking Michael Jordan to get where you are just so you can trash my hometown? Oh, and I heard, that with Fruit of the Loom waistband elastic still stuck between his teeth, Wilbon has backed off on his "terrile" comment, now saying: It's a pretty good sports town.but not great..."
Whatever!
In the words of Vincent (Vinny) LaGuardia "Bag of Donoughnuts" Gambini: "I'm through with DIS guy!"
10 College Football Predictions - Week 6
Finally, I look like I know what I am doing. A 7-3 record last week looks good, but as I watching the snow fall last night, I knew it wasn't good enough. So we are hoping for an 8-2 record this week to even my record for the year at 31-31.
How The Mighty Have Fallen
It is a sad state of affairs to be a Washington Redkins fan right now. When your fans are flipping out over a win over a franchise like the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, you know that something is wrong. In a display of modern football, the Redskins beat the Buccaneers 24-22 with a last second field goal from Billy Cundiff.
Let's see what went right for the Redskins. RG III is still an unknown commodity. By that, I mean that teams are still getting the feel of how he plays the game. Their offensive line beat the Buccaneers at the point of attack. I understand that in Pro football, you have to have the next man up mentality, but Redskins fans shouldn't be celebrating the offensive line as the second coming of the Hogs yet. When the opponent's defensive line is playing 3 reserves as starters, you should be able to control the line of scrimmage. The running game is a hidden gem for the Redskins. They have tailbacks that can step in for each other. While you won't get superstar stats, you will get good stats from the group. The Redskins acquisition of Pierre Garcon isn't looking bad at the current time. In fact, it might be the best free agent that the Redskins have signed in the last couple of years. And finally the defense stifled the 30th ranked offense in the NFL for the most part. Of course, it lost a double digit lead in the 4th Quarter, so there is something to be said for consistency.
Let's see what went right for the Redskins. RG III is still an unknown commodity. By that, I mean that teams are still getting the feel of how he plays the game. Their offensive line beat the Buccaneers at the point of attack. I understand that in Pro football, you have to have the next man up mentality, but Redskins fans shouldn't be celebrating the offensive line as the second coming of the Hogs yet. When the opponent's defensive line is playing 3 reserves as starters, you should be able to control the line of scrimmage. The running game is a hidden gem for the Redskins. They have tailbacks that can step in for each other. While you won't get superstar stats, you will get good stats from the group. The Redskins acquisition of Pierre Garcon isn't looking bad at the current time. In fact, it might be the best free agent that the Redskins have signed in the last couple of years. And finally the defense stifled the 30th ranked offense in the NFL for the most part. Of course, it lost a double digit lead in the 4th Quarter, so there is something to be said for consistency.
Tuesday, October 02, 2012
Week 4 "Pick 'Em" Winner: JIM, JIM, JIM!!
CONGRATULATIONS to Jim for
being our dominant BoSox Tavern NFL “Pick ‘Em” Week 4 Champ with 12 wins! YEA!! Had it not been for the Lions and Seahawks
jamming up Shelly’s mojo, Jim would have smoked the field!! So, the golden ring goes to Jim this
week. Zeb and Shelly are now tied for
the overall points lead (total wins) with 37 picks each.
I don’t have much to say
in the form of commentary since the regular refs showed up, made almost all the
right calls, making this week kinda boring in the replay/controversy
department. I kinda liked the
unpredictability of the replacement zebras.
My Skins are back in the
“win” column…barely! (“Hey coach! Ever heard of this thing called ‘going for
it?!’”) But who am I to complain, we
won, right?
Now, I'm just waiting for my Tampon Spray Yuckaneers blog challenge post! BK, where ya at?
So, this week’s results
are:
THIS WEEK’S RESULTS: SCORES:
- Jim: 12
wins Ravens: 23 Browns: 16- Brent: 11 wins Redskins: 24 Buccaneers: 23
- Rick: 11 wins Falcons: 30 Panthers: 28
- Shelly: 11 wins Patriots: 52 Bills: 28
- AA: 10 wins Vikings: 20 Lions: 13
- Zeb: 9 wins Chargers: 37 Chiefs: 20
- Robbie: 9 wins Rams: 19 Seahawks: 13
- George: 9 wins 49ers: 34 Jets: 0
Texans: 38 Titans: 14
STANDINGS: Broncos: 37 Raiders: 6
Weekly Wins Points Cardinals: 24 Dolphins: 21
- Zeb: 1 Zeb: 37 Bengals: 27 Jaguars: 10
- Shelly: 1 Shelly: 37 Packers: 28 Saints: 27
- George: 1 Brent: 36 Eagles: 19 Giants: 17
- Jim: 1 Jim: 35 Bears: 34 Cowboys: 18
- Aaron: 0 Rick: 35
- Robbie: 0 AA: 34
- Rick: 0 Robbie: 32
- Brent: 0 George: 31
Time to get your picks
in for next week (Week 5):
ARI/STL ATL/WAS MIA/CIN GB/IND BAL/KC TEN/MIN
CLE/NYG PHI/PIT SEA/CAR CHI/JAX DEN/NE BUF/SFSD/NO HOU/NYJ (Monday)
BYEs: Tampa Bay, Detroit, Oakland, Dallas
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Gangnam Style - The Tampa Bay Bucs Way
This is the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Captain Fear doing a video to Gangnam Style. Boy, do I wish that I was Captain Fear during this.
Saturday, September 29, 2012
JIM McMAHON TRAGEDY.
I found this and thought it was very interesting. I always had a great respect for Jim, I don't have to get into his good/bad points because they are discussed in the article. But the point I found so important is all the talk over the last few years about concussions, and the deaths of some very young hockey players. The age 53 is so young and your life is still just taken for granted at that age. But to have your mind slowly go, which is a terrible thing at any age. This must be, and is devastating, and something that franchises from any sport should be looking at very, very, closely. If there is any problem because this article has been borrowed please delete.
Super Bowl-winning quarterback Jim McMahon says he wishes he had played baseball
By Maggie Hendricks | Shutdown Corner – Thu, 27 Sep, 2012 3:20 PM EDT
(Getty)In my family, the members of the 1985 Super Bowl-winning Chicago Bears team ranked just slightly behind the Father, Son and the Holy Ghost. In fact, as a 6-year-old I was taught the "Super Bowl Shuffle" by a Franciscan nun, so that ranking could be muddled at times. Walter Payton was at the top of the list, but I couldn't help but be crazy about the rebellious, mouthy, "Punky QB known as McMahon."During his career with the Bears, Philadelphia Eagles and other teams, McMahon never started a full season. His tough and sometimes reckless style of play meant he suffered many, many injuries. Now, 16 years after he retired, he is experiencing an injury that can't be fixed by a surgery or therapy.
At 53, McMahon is in the early stages of dementia. He is part of the group suing the NFL that says they hid the effects of concussions. Though his career resulted in a Super Bowl ring and a Pro Bowl appearance, he still says he would have played baseball if he knew what concussions would do to him.
"Being injured, if you don't play, you don't get paid. If I was able to walk out on that field, I was gonna play," he said in an interview with Chicago's WFLD-TV at his Arizona home. "Had I known about that stuff early on in my career, I probably would have chosen a different career. I always wanted to be a baseball player anyway."McMahon played football while at Brigham Young University, but said he would have stuck with baseball had he received a scholarship for that sport.
He is a group of more than 2,000 players who need help from the NFL after concussions have filled their retirement with dementia, memory loss, and in some cases, a bitter end. McMahon's teammate, Dave Duerson, committed suicide and asked for his brain to be studied. He was found to have chronic traumatic encephalopathy, the same disease found in other players who have died under tragic circumstances.
The NFL has made strides in improving how concussions and head injuries are treated. Though problems still exist, like Colt McCoy being sent back in the game last season when he was not healthy, the culture around head traumas is changing.
But the retired players who sacrificed their bodies to create the exciting game we all know and love today should not be forgotten. When one of them says he wishes he didn't even play the game that won him fame, it's a cry for help that should not go unheeded.
10 College Football Predictions - Week 5
I am improving. Even though it doesn't appear that I am by the record. Another 4-7 week. Another week of teams going up and down with their play. But I am starting to figure out some teams that should continue to be better than most and I was picking teams that won, just not by enough. So let's try this again.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Looking Ahead (and wishing I hadn't)
I receive updates from the Red Sox in my email from time to time, today being no exception. More often than not I don't bother with them since they're selling something or telling me something I already know but today's link was different in that it was touting the release of the 2013 (yes, 2013!) Red Sox regular season schedule.
So click the link I did because, even though I think there are too many interleague games, I like it and am curious who'll be coming to town. Don't get excited, boys and girls, there's nothing to get excited about. Here's the teams from the National League that the Sox will be playing next year, in no particular order since they all suck: The Padres (hey RJ, wanna come to Boston? LOL), the Diamondbacks and the Rockies. The Astros are also on the schedule but I think they become an American League team next year -- yawn! (Hey Brent, four-game series in Boston at the end of April!)
So other than the favorite teams of my two farthest away blog buddies coming to town, it's absolutely the worst set of teams possible. And now that the Stros are in the AL, we supposedly have the benefit of a balanced schedule, which means the Red Sox will be playing a two-game series in COLORADO for their next to last series of next season. Tell me please how that's balanced? I guess it is in a world where a one-game playoff is balanced.
So click the link I did because, even though I think there are too many interleague games, I like it and am curious who'll be coming to town. Don't get excited, boys and girls, there's nothing to get excited about. Here's the teams from the National League that the Sox will be playing next year, in no particular order since they all suck: The Padres (hey RJ, wanna come to Boston? LOL), the Diamondbacks and the Rockies. The Astros are also on the schedule but I think they become an American League team next year -- yawn! (Hey Brent, four-game series in Boston at the end of April!)
So other than the favorite teams of my two farthest away blog buddies coming to town, it's absolutely the worst set of teams possible. And now that the Stros are in the AL, we supposedly have the benefit of a balanced schedule, which means the Red Sox will be playing a two-game series in COLORADO for their next to last series of next season. Tell me please how that's balanced? I guess it is in a world where a one-game playoff is balanced.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
NFL Upholds Seahawks Win -- Of Course, What Else Did You Expect?
The NFL offices today came out and conceded that a bad call ultimately cost the Green Bay Packers a win, but I interject that NFL's statement was a self-serving piece of male bovine excrement. Of course, they're going to agree with their "scab" referees (I'm not going to use "replacements" because it sounds too PC.) The bad call they conceded was offensive pass interference -- which is not reviewable and was a meaningless concession. The NFL wants to interject that this call was correctly made on the field and didn't effect the outcome of the game. Moo, moo.
When the NFL sided with the scab referees, they affirmed the erroneous judgement call on the field. Holding is a judgement call, pass interference is a judgement call, and they are not reviewable. However, turnovers are reviewable. That the scabs couldn't differentiate between simultaneous possession and one receiver trying to steal the ball from a defender didn't matter to the NFL offices. Thus, the NFL gets to sit in their offices in New York City and tell everyone, "We're sticking with the judgement call. It didn't effect the outcome of the game. What is everybody poo-pooing about?" It is sooooo self-serving in the referee strike crisis and negotiations in their public statement that a mistake wasn't made, and that they'll continue to use scab referees. Then there's statements out of their office about, "Well, even the real referees make mistakes during games too." IMMATERIAL!!! Would the real referees have made THIS mistake on THIS call is the only question, but we'll never know because they were sitting at home drinking beer and eating nachos. (Unless you're Ed Hochuli, he was probably doing arm curls.) *I know I owe someone a reference to that one, I can't remember who -- sorry.
I'm not saying the NFL should have overturned the call the next day and give the Packers a win -- that would have been unprecedented and set an extremely slippery slope; could you imagine that happening every week? What I'm saying is the NFL talks the talk about "integrity of the game" (moo, moo) but doesn't walk the walk. The NFL should have recognized a mistake was done, that the scabs are knuckleheads and blow calls, but that they won't/can't reverse it, and let's move on to next week.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






